TIRUPATHUR District · 15 candidates · 3 with declared cases
G.SENDHIL KUMAR
Not satisfied with any candidate? Learn why NOTA is a long-term corrective, not a wasted vote.
Vaniyambadi constituency, represented by AIADMK's G. Sendhil Kumar since his narrow 2021 victory (46.69% vote share, defeating IUML by 4,904 votes), has experienced development primarily through state and central government schemes rather than constituency-specific initiatives. The constituency benefited from Tamil Nadu's broader infrastructure push, including the four-laning of National Highway 179A from Harur to Vaniyambadi under the Bharatmala Pariyojana scheme, and connectivity improvements from the Bengaluru-Chennai Expressway project. Healthcare infrastructure saw notable progress with new government hospital buildings in Vaniyambadi and nearby Ambur announced for completion, while the state's Jal Jeevan Mission achieved 90% rural tap water connections, though funding disputes between the state and central government emerged. However, specific constituency-level achievements directly attributable to the sitting MLA remain largely undocumented in available records. Long-standing issues persist, including water resource depletion and groundwater exploitation in the Pullur area (the Palar River's starting point), and pollution from tanneries affecting the agrarian constituency. The constituency's leather export hub status positioned it to potentially benefit from the Chennai-Kanyakumari Industrial Corridor, though concrete outcomes are not detailed. No major controversies, protests, or broken promises specifically involving MLA Sendhil Kumar were documented during this period. As Vaniyambadi heads into the April 23, 2026 elections with approximately 240,220 registered voters, the lack of visible, constituency-specific development projects and the absence of documented MLA interventions on local issues like water scarcity may be significant considerations. Voters should weigh whether the broader state-level development initiatives have adequately addressed Vaniyambadi's specific needs, particularly regarding water resources, industrial growth, and civic infrastructure that were not explicitly detailed in the five-year period.
Turnout
75.93%
Total Votes
1,89,997
Victory Margin
4,904 (2.58%)
NOTA Votes
1,492 (0.79%)
Total Electors: 2,50,227
| # | Candidate | Votes | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
“Sources: 8 web references”
G. Sendhil Kumar AIADMK |
| 88,018 |
| 46.69% |
| 2 | N. Mohammed Nayeem IUML | 83,114 | 44.09% |
| 3 | A. J. Devendhiran NTK | 11,226 | 5.96% |
| 4 | T. S. Vakeel Ahmed AIMIM | 1,897 | 1.01% |
| 5 | M. Gnana Doss MNM | 1,868 | 0.99% |
| — | NOTA (None of the Above) | 1,492 | 0.79% |
Turnout
77.26%
Total Votes
1,72,638
Victory Margin
14,526 (8.41%)
Total Electors: 2,23,451
NILOFER
ADMK
69,588
40.31%
Syed Farooq
IUML
55,062
31.89%
Govi. Sampathkumar