
047 - Vaniyambadi constituency, at Serial no 436 in Part no 196
VANIYAMBADI ConstituencyAge
42
Education
Post Graduate
Profession
Agriculture, stock market investment, shopping mall
Constituency
VANIYAMBADI
ViewAI-generated content based on web sources. Verify independently before making decisions.
Guardian
M. Gopal
Spouse Profession
Agriculture, stock market investment, shopping mall
Current Representative — VANIYAMBADI
G.Sendhil Kumar
AIADMK · Won in 2021
Total Assets
₹7.61 Cr
Movable Assets
₹2.06 Cr
Immovable Assets
₹5.55 Cr
Liabilities
₹1.01 Cr
Affidavit declares 4 criminal cases including serious charges under IPC Section 171E (bribery), Section 353 (assault on public servant), and unlawful assembly provisions. Web search results make no mention of these cases whatsoever, which is unusual for an MLA with such charges. The lack of public information about these cases raises questions about their context, status, and whether voters are adequately informed.
4
Total Cases
1
Serious IPC
Charges
Punishment for bribery
Assault or criminal force to deter public servant from discharge of his duty
Being member of an unlawful assembly.)
Disobedience to order duly promulgated by public servant
Wrongfully restraining any person.)
Financial Year: 2025 - 2026
Financial Year: 2025 - 2026
Financial Year: 2025 - 2026
Political History
2021 - Won Vaniyambadi constituency in Tamil Nadu Assembly elections as AIADMK candidate with 88,018 votes (46.69%), defeating IUML's N. Mohammed Nayeem by 4,904 votes
2021-Present - Serving as Member of Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly from Vaniyambadi
Achievements
• Successfully won the Vaniyambadi constituency in 2021 as a first-time candidate, maintaining AIADMK's hold on the seat with 46.69% vote share
G. Sendhil Kumar is viewed primarily through the lens of his narrow 2021 electoral victory in Vaniyambadi, winning by just 4,904 votes (2.60% margin). Public visibility is extremely limited with no discernible social media presence or documented public statements. The absence of information about local development work or community engagement suggests either a low-profile legislative approach or limited media coverage of his activities as MLA.