NAGAPATTINAM District · 20 candidates · 2 with declared cases
Rajakumar.S
Not satisfied with any candidate? Learn why NOTA is a long-term corrective, not a wasted vote.
Mayiladuthurai constituency, represented by S. Rajakumar of the Indian National Congress since his narrow 2021 victory (margin of 2,742 votes), has witnessed mixed progress over the past five years. The constituency gained administrative importance when it became Tamil Nadu's 38th district in December 2020 and was upgraded to a Special Grade Municipality in 2023. Major infrastructure developments include the completion of NH-32 (Chennai to Sirkazhi stretch) in March 2024, foundation laying for a ₹185 crore bypass road in February 2026, and ongoing railway station modernization expected by mid-2026. State-wide welfare schemes like Makkalai Thedi Maruthuvam (doorstep healthcare launched August 2021), Kalaignar Magalir Urimai Thittam (₹1,000 monthly assistance to women), and the Chief Minister's Breakfast Scheme (₹600 crore allocation in 2025-26) have benefited residents. Tourism development in Tharangambadi received ₹45 crore allocation in 2025, and 2,498 houses for economically weaker families are under construction since November 2024. However, significant challenges persist. The ₹83.03 crore underground sewerage project has faced criticism for slow progress, and the district headquarters hospital reportedly lacks basic facilities. The closure of the NPKR Sugar Mills in 2017 continues to impact local farmers and employment, with no revival in sight. Infrastructure delays, including the sewerage project and bus stand development, have frustrated voters. Solid waste management remains inadequate, with only 85 of 104 metric tonnes of daily waste being collected. Youth migration due to limited industrial growth and employment opportunities is a growing concern, despite the district headquarters status. Voters should consider both the tangible infrastructure improvements—particularly in road connectivity and housing—and the persistent gaps in healthcare facilities, sanitation infrastructure, and industrial development. While state-level welfare schemes have provided relief, local-specific issues like the delayed sewerage project, hospital inadequacies, and the unresolved sugar mill closure remain unaddressed after five years. The 2026 election offers an opportunity to evaluate whether the sitting MLA has effectively advocated for constituency-specific needs beyond benefiting from state government schemes.
Turnout
70.97%
Total Votes
1,74,640
Victory Margin
2,742 (1.57%)
NOTA Votes
1,067 (0.61%)
Total Electors: 2,46,076
| # | Candidate | Votes | Share |
|---|---|---|---|

Ananthakumar. R

Bharathiraja. B

Gangadharan. R

Gobala Krishnan. S

Jamal Mohamed

Natarajan. R

Navanitham. S

Ramkumar. S

Sampath. L

Thimothy. T

Veerasamy. T
“Sources: 15 web references”
S. Rajakumar INC |
| 73,642 |
| 42.17% |
| 2 | A. Palanisamy PMK | 70,900 | 40.60% |
| 3 | K. Kasiraman NTK | 13,186 | 7.55% |
| 4 | R. K. Anbarasan Komal AMMK | 7,282 | 4.17% |
| 5 | N. Ravichandran MNM | 5,933 | 3.40% |
| — | NOTA (None of the Above) | 1,067 | 0.61% |
Turnout
72.4%
Total Votes
1,68,856
Victory Margin
4,778 (2.83%)
Total Electors: 2,33,227
RATHAKRISHNAN.V
ADMK
70,949
42.02%
Anbazhagan.K
DMK
66,171
39.19%