Rubin Antony

Rubin Antony, 30, is contesting from the KILLIYOOR constituency in Tamil Nadu on a Tamizhaga Vaazhvurimai Katchi ticket. He declares his profession as 'Used Vehicle Business' with total assets of Rs. 18.41 lakhs (Rs. 12.41 lakhs movable and Rs. 6 lakhs immovable) and liabilities of Rs. 1.59 lakhs. Despite extensive searches, no biographical information, political history, or public record of his activities could be found online, suggesting he is either a first-time political entrant or operates primarily at the grassroots level without significant media presence. The most concerning aspect of his candidacy is his criminal record. His affidavit declares 4 criminal cases with charges including Section 307 (Attempt to Murder) and Section 324 (Voluntarily causing hurt by dangerous weapons) - both categorized as serious offenses. Additional charges include Sections 147 and 148 (Rioting and rioting armed with deadly weapon), Section 323 (Voluntarily causing hurt), Section 341 (Wrongful restraint), and Section 109 (Abetment). These violent charges involving weapons and attempt to murder represent serious red flags for voters considering a candidate for public office. At 30 years of age, Rubin Antony represents a young candidate entering electoral politics, but his educational qualification is listed only as 'Others' without specification. His financial position appears modest for someone in the used vehicle business, with total assets under Rs. 19 lakhs. The Tamizhaga Vaazhvurimai Katchi itself appears to be a lesser-known political entity in Tamil Nadu, with limited online presence or documented electoral history. Voters in KILLIYOOR should note the complete absence of any documented public service record, development work, or political achievements for this candidate. Combined with serious criminal charges including attempt to murder, the lack of transparency and public accountability creates significant concerns. Without any verifiable information about his background, community work, or vision for the constituency, voters have little basis beyond the affidavit to evaluate his suitability for public office.