Rajivgandhi S

Rajivgandhi S, 40, is contesting the 2026 Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly elections as an Independent candidate from Kallakurichi (SC) constituency. With 8th standard education, he declares his profession as tailor and agriculture, though his recent political career suggests full-time involvement in politics. He previously won the 2021 election from the same constituency as an AIADMK candidate, securing 110,643 votes with a commanding 49.26% vote share. His decision to contest as an Independent in 2026 after being a sitting AIADMK MLA represents a significant political shift, though the reasons for this party separation remain unclear from available public sources. His asset declaration shows total assets of Rs. 1.05 crore (movable assets of Rs. 15.41 lakh and immovable assets of Rs. 90 lakh) with liabilities of Rs. 8.4 lakh. For a sitting MLA, these figures appear within reasonable range, though the declaration of 'tailor and agriculture' as profession raises questions about income sources given his full-time political role. His affidavit shows zero criminal cases, maintaining a clean legal record on paper. During his tenure, Kallakurichi has seen substantial government investment, with Chief Minister M.K. Stalin launching development projects worth over ₹1.7 billion in February 2026, including the Kalaignar Women's Rights Scheme benefiting 3.18 lakh women, breakfast schemes for students, and industrial investments creating approximately 20,000 jobs. However, it's unclear what specific role Rajivgandhi played in securing or implementing these projects. His public visibility remains remarkably low, with minimal social media presence or recorded public statements despite being a sitting MLA. Voters should note the significant shift from AIADMK to Independent status without clear public explanation, the mismatch between declared profession and actual political career, and the overall lack of documented achievements or controversies during his 2021-2026 tenure. The absence of a clear public narrative about his work as MLA, combined with confusion created by name similarity with other political figures, makes it difficult for voters to assess his performance and credentials comprehensively.