RAMANATHAPURAM District · 20 candidates · 4 with declared cases
R.S.RAJAKANNAPPAN
Not satisfied with any candidate? Learn why NOTA is a long-term corrective, not a wasted vote.
Mudukulathur constituency in Tamil Nadu, represented by DMK MLA R.S. Rajakannappan since 2021, has experienced a mixed five-year term marked by statewide development initiatives but overshadowed by serious corruption allegations. The constituency benefited from broader Tamil Nadu government schemes including the Jal Jeevan Mission for clean drinking water, Swachh Bharat Mission for sanitation, Chief Minister's Comprehensive Health Insurance Scheme, and housing initiatives under PMAY-G. Employment programs like Moolakarai Thittam and Naan Mudhalvan Scheme aimed to support youth entrepreneurship and skill development. The MLA had access to MLACDS funds for local development projects, though specific constituency-level project details remain limited in available records. However, the term has been significantly marred by allegations of a ₹411 crore land scam involving MLA Rajakannappan. The controversy centers on accusations that his sons, through their company Deccan Fun and Hotels Private Limited, allegedly acquired state-owned land (Survey Nos. 1353 and 1352) through dubious means, with the land allegedly undervalued in government guidelines. These allegations have triggered demands for investigation from opposition groups and raised serious questions about transparency and accountability in land dealings. The constituency also likely faced common Tamil Nadu challenges including rising living costs, increased electricity tariffs, property taxes, and water charges since 2021, which have contributed to public dissatisfaction. As voters approach the 2026 elections, they should consider both the implementation of statewide welfare schemes in their area and the serious corruption allegations against their sitting MLA. The lack of detailed, constituency-specific project information makes it difficult to assess local development outcomes comprehensively. Voters should evaluate whether promised infrastructure improvements—particularly in roads, irrigation for this agrarian region, and civic amenities—have materialized, and whether the land scam allegations have been adequately addressed through proper investigation and accountability mechanisms.
Turnout
71.13%
Total Votes
2,21,196
Victory Margin
20,721 (9.37%)
NOTA Votes
532 (0.24%)
Total Electors: 3,10,974
| # | Candidate | Votes | Share |
|---|---|---|---|

A. Saravanakumar

Chandra Prabha Jeyapal

C.Malaiselvam

G. Selvaraj

K.Senthil Mallar

Malarvizhi. B

M. Irulandi

C.Kengusamy

K.Gangai Amaran
K.Murugan

K.Rajakumar

M.Boominathan Alias M.K.Vaiyavan

M.Karuppa Samy

Ravi Govinthan

R.Moovendran

Sathiyam C.Saravanan

V.Pandi
“Sources: 11 web references”
R.S.Rajakannappan DMK |
| 1,01,901 |
| 46.07% |
| 2 | Keerthika Muniyasamy AIADMK | 81,180 | 36.70% |
| 3 | M. Murugan AMMK | 19,699 | 8.91% |
| 4 | R. Rahmadnisha NTK | 11,234 | 5.08% |
| 5 | C. Navapanneerselvam MNM | 943 | 0.43% |
| 6 | K. Sathish Independent | 815 | 0.37% |
| 7 | G. M. Senthilmurugan Independent | 722 | 0.33% |
| 8 | A. Saravanakumar Naam Indiar Party | 614 | 0.28% |
| 9 | S. Prabakaran Independent | 557 | 0.25% |
| 10 | N. Sivanandam BSP | 535 | 0.24% |
| — | NOTA (None of the Above) | 532 | 0.24% |