CHENGALPATTU District · 15 candidates · 3 with declared cases
VARALAKSHMI.M
Not satisfied with any candidate? Learn why NOTA is a long-term corrective, not a wasted vote.
Chengalpattu constituency in Tamil Nadu witnessed significant development activity between 2021 and 2026, alongside persistent civic challenges and governance controversies. The period saw major infrastructure investments including the inauguration of Chennai Metro Rail's second phase (worth ₹61,843 crore), the launch of a new 21-acre industrial estate at Kadambadi Sculpture Park in September 2025 (projected to create 1,800 jobs), and foundation stones laid for a new bus stand and dialysis centre in November 2023. State-wide welfare schemes benefited residents, including the Chief Minister's expanded Breakfast Scheme, laptop distribution to 20 lakh college students, and fare-free bus travel for women (₹3,600 crore allocation). The 'Kalaignar Nagarpura Mempattu Thittam' scheme provided ₹1,000 crore for basic infrastructure across municipalities including Chengalpattu during 2021-22. However, the constituency faced serious governance issues. Major corruption allegations emerged involving the Municipal Administration and Water Supply department's cash-for-jobs scam and a ₹1,000 crore TASMAC irregularities scandal involving state ministers, eroding public confidence. Residents continued to face recurring civic problems including monsoon flooding due to inadequate drainage, water scarcity with the Palar River not reaching all areas, and poor waste management causing health hazards. Key infrastructure promises remained unfulfilled, including sewer line installations, subway connections under the rail overbridge, and complete drainage improvements. Anti-delimitation protests erupted in April 2026, and farmers reported delays in loan disbursements and MSP implementation. Voters should weigh the constituency's infrastructure development and welfare scheme expansion against unresolved civic issues, corruption allegations at the state level, incomplete local projects, and the gap between announced initiatives and ground-level implementation. The identity of the sitting MLA during this period remains unclear from available data.
Turnout
63.97%
Total Votes
2,74,087
Victory Margin
26,665 (9.73%)
NOTA Votes
3,075 (1.13%)
Total Electors: 4,28,462
| # | Candidate | Votes | Share |
|---|---|---|---|

A.Esakkiappan

C.Vimalraj

G. Christopher

Karthick.A

M.Anandan

P.George Devadoss

S.Delhi Babu

T. Prem Balaji

V. Ramakrishnan
“Sources: 18 web references”
M. Varalakshmi DMK |
| 1,30,573 |
| 48.18% |
| 2 | Gajendran. M AIADMK | 1,03,908 | 38.34% |
| 3 | Sanjeevinathan. K NTK | 26,868 | 9.91% |
| 4 | Muthamilselvan. S IJK | 4,146 | 1.53% |
| 5 | Sathishkumar. A AMMK | 3,069 | 1.13% |
| — | NOTA (None of the Above) | 3,075 | 1.13% |
Turnout
67.3%
Total Votes
2,49,774
Victory Margin
26,292 (10.53%)
Total Electors: 3,71,135
VARALAKSHMI.M
DMK
1,12,675
45.11%
Kamalakkannan.R
ADMK
86,383
34.58%
D. Murugesan