Vijayakumar Alias Navalpattu S Viji

Vijayakumar, known by his alias Navalpattu Viji, is a 56-year-old candidate contesting from the Thiruverumbur constituency in Tamil Nadu on a Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam (TVK) ticket. With education up to the 10th standard, he declares his profession as agriculture and business, having accumulated assets worth approximately Rs. 24 crores against liabilities of nearly Rs. 10 crores. His candidacy comes as part of TVK's debut electoral effort in the 2026 Tamil Nadu Assembly elections, a party founded by actor Vijay in February 2024 that positions itself as an alternative to the traditional DMK-AIADMK binary in Tamil Nadu politics. Vijayakumar faces legal challenges with 5 criminal cases on record, including one serious charge under IPC Section 505(2) relating to statements causing public mischief. Additional charges include mischief causing damage (427), membership in unlawful assembly (143), disobedience to public servant orders (188), wrongful restraint (341), and voluntarily causing hurt (323). These cases suggest involvement in incidents related to public order and physical altercations, which raise questions about his conduct in community interactions. No verifiable information about Vijayakumar's specific political history, development work, or public service record could be found in available sources. Unlike the high-profile founder of his party, Vijayakumar appears to be a grassroots-level candidate without significant media presence or documented political achievements prior to this election. His substantial wealth accumulation in agriculture and business, combined with limited educational background and lack of public track record, leaves voters with little information to assess his qualifications beyond what appears in his affidavit. Voters in Thiruverumbur should note that while TVK represents a new political force advocating social justice and secularism, this specific candidate comes with significant financial holdings that lack transparent sourcing, multiple pending criminal cases involving violence and public disorder, and no documented history of public service or community development work. The absence of information about his business ventures, agricultural operations, or previous civic engagement makes it difficult to evaluate his capability to represent the constituency effectively.