S.Tamilchelvi

S. Tamilchelvi, 61, is a retired Associate Professor with a Doctorate degree who represents the Naam Tamilar Katchi (NTK) in Tambaram constituency. She declared assets worth Rs 2.85 crore with no liabilities or criminal cases. As an NTK candidate, she contested the 2024 Lok Sabha elections from Chennai South constituency, losing to DMK's T Sumathy, though the party secured 8.19% vote share statewide, reflecting its growing influence. The NTK, originally founded in 1958 and revived in 2010 by actor-turned-politician Seeman, focuses on Tamil nationalism, advocating for Tamil identity, language preservation, and support for an independent Tamil Eelam in Sri Lanka. The party has positioned itself as an alternative to traditional Dravidian parties, refusing alliances with DMK, AIADMK, or BJP. It was recognized as a state party by the Election Commission and allocated the farmer symbol for contesting the 2026 Assembly elections independently across all 234 constituencies. However, the party has been embroiled in multiple controversies. NTK organized disruptive protests against the film 'Kingdom' in 2024, forcing the Madras High Court to direct police protection for theaters and emphasize that censor-approved films cannot be blocked. In 2019, five men from Tambaram were arrested for creating TikTok videos threatening party leader Seeman. Additionally, Seeman faced sedition charges for advocating that fishermen be armed to reclaim Katchatheevu island from Sri Lanka. On the positive side, NTK has advocated for herders' rights, organizing rallies with over 100 cattle demanding grazing land rights and promoting sustainable agriculture and organic farming. Voters should know that while Tamilchelvi represents a party gaining traction among those seeking alternatives to traditional politics—particularly youth attracted to Tamil nationalism—the NTK has not won any legislative seats despite growing vote shares. The party's independent stance and focus on Tamil identity appeals to some voters, but its involvement in disruptive protests and legal controversies raises questions about its approach to democratic engagement.