
Polur constituency, at Serial no 55 in Part no 85
POLUR ConstituencyIndependent
Age
43
Education
Graduate Professional
Profession
Agriculture
Affidavit declares profession as 'Agriculture' but web search shows S. C. Purushothaman contested the 2006 assembly election as a DMDK candidate, indicating active political involvement. The extremely low declared assets (Rs. 63,257 with zero immovable property) seem inconsistent with someone who has been politically active for nearly two decades. The name spelling variation (S. C. Purushothaman vs. Purusothaman. M) and lack of any agricultural income or land ownership raises questions about occupation declaration accuracy.
AI-generated content based on web sources. Verify independently before making decisions.
Guardian
Munusamy
Spouse Profession
NIL
Current Representative — POLUR
Agri Krishnamurthy. S S
AIADMK · Won in 2021
Declared total assets of only Rs. 63,257 with zero immovable property appears unusually low for a 43-year-old graduate professional who has been contesting elections since at least 2006 (nearly 20 years of political activity). No land ownership despite declaring 'Agriculture' as profession. The absence of any house, land, or significant savings after two decades of adult life and political involvement warrants scrutiny. Either there are undisclosed assets or the financial situation is extraordinarily modest for someone in public life.
Total Assets
₹63.3 K
Movable Assets
₹63.3 K
Immovable Assets
₹0
Liabilities
₹0
Political History
2006 - Contested Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly election from Polur constituency as DMDK candidate; secured 6,867 votes (5.52%), finished third place, lost by wide margin to INC winner
2025 - Contesting from Polur constituency as Independent candidate
Purusothaman remains a politically obscure figure with minimal public visibility and virtually no online presence. His electoral history shows a distant third-place finish in 2006 with just 5.52% vote share, and he has failed to gain significant traction in the constituency dominated by major Dravidian parties. There is no evidence of community engagement, development work, or public support.