Dr.Pandikumar.S

Dr. Pandikumar S is a 39-year-old candidate contesting from the Bodinayakkanur constituency in Tamil Nadu on a CPI(ML)(L) ticket in the 2026 Assembly elections. Despite holding a doctorate degree, he declares his profession as 'Law Student,' which is an unusual combination for someone approaching 40. His declared assets stand at approximately Rs. 19.23 lakhs (movable: Rs. 3.23 lakhs, immovable: Rs. 16 lakhs) with liabilities of Rs. 3.10 lakhs, placing him in the modest asset category compared to many Assembly candidates. The most significant concern in his candidacy is the declaration of 4 criminal cases, including 2 serious IPC charges. These include Section 498A (cruelty to woman by husband or relative of husband) and Section 406 (criminal breach of trust) - both non-bailable offenses. Additionally, he faces charges under Section 353 (assault or criminal force to deter public servant from discharge of duty), Section 342 (wrongful confinement), Section 189 (threat of injury to public servant), Section 143 (being member of unlawful assembly), and Section 290 (public nuisance). The combination of domestic violence allegations and assault on government officials raises serious questions about conduct and temperament. Dr. Pandikumar S is contesting from Bodinayakkanur, a constituency that has gained significant attention in the 2026 elections due to veteran politician O. Panneerselvam's switch from AIADMK to DMK. The seat has historically been an AIADMK stronghold, won by OPS three times. Despite the high-profile nature of this constituency battle, Dr. Pandikumar S has virtually no digital footprint, media coverage, or documented public activities. No information about his development work, community service, political career, or public statements could be found in available sources. Voters should note that while CPI(ML)(L) traditionally champions workers' rights and social justice causes, this particular candidate faces serious criminal allegations including charges related to violence against women and assault on public servants. The lack of any public track record, combined with the serious nature of pending criminal cases, means voters have limited information to assess his suitability for legislative responsibilities. The unusual profession declaration and absence of documented political or social work also warrant scrutiny.